LResearch library · source navigator

Sources and bibliography

Primary-text leads, subject literature, historical material and public research resources. Each source retains its related dossier and context for search, comparison and citation.

34dossiers58external research entries48core terms
A research table joining texts, catalogues, manuscripts and digital resources

01Four research routes

Find sources by research question

One name may belong at once to method, history, text and social practice. These four routes interconnect, but answer different questions.

02Layered reading

Three depths of reading

The library separates public orientation, specialist study and independent research. You may move quickly, but should not skip checks of terminology, period and source type.

  1. 01

    Public orientation

    Read atlas summaries, the historical overview and glossary definitions to establish names, periods and families.

    For first encounters with Chinese mantic arts
  2. 02

    Specialist study

    Enter a dossier's principles, texts, evidence limits and related systems; record differences among editions and lineages.

    For learners with a defined field
  3. 03

    Independent research

    Return to primary texts, catalogues, archaeology and institutional databases; publish citations, procedures and uncertainties.

    For papers, translation, reconstruction and digital projects

03Evaluating sources

Six dimensions of source evaluation

An institutional page may offer only an introduction; a lineage manuscript may preserve a valuable lead. Evaluation asks exactly what a source can establish, regardless of institutional or lineage status.

01

What is the material?

Received edition, excavated manuscript, object, oral account, paper and modern manual support different claims.

02

How is it dated?

Separate the date claimed in a text, the surviving edition, attribution and the date of modern cataloguing.

03

Can the passage be located?

Record chapter, fascicle, page, edition, collection number or a stable link whenever possible.

04

Tradition or research conclusion?

Layer lineage interpretation, cultural narrative, historical claim and modern validation.

05

Can the procedure be reproduced?

Charts and calculations require inputs, rules, calendar conventions and intermediate steps.

06

Are the limits explicit?

Cases do not generalize automatically; mantic content does not replace medical, legal or financial advice.

04Source catalogue

Public source catalogue

These links are the sources already annotated in dossiers and the history: museums, universities, research institutes, academic publishers and digital text projects. External content and availability remain under the responsible institution.

Current context · 奇门遁甲

4 / 58 sources

zh.wikisource.orgWeb pageOnline historical-text transcription

遁甲演義(四庫全書本)

A transcription labelled as the Siku edition of Dunjia Yanyi. Its abstract attributes the work to Cheng Daosheng of the Ming; volume one includes several methods and star-gate movement examples.

Responsibility
Attributed in the abstract to Cheng Daosheng of the Ming; Wikisource transcription
Identifier / locator
卷一 · 時家奇門 / 八門九星逐時移宮訣
Year and version
Online transcription labelled Siku Quanshu edition; not collated against images
Reading and citation notes
Locating the evidence
See the abstract and volume one's origin, hourly-method, Yanbo Diaosou Rhapsody and hourly star-gate movement sections. The hourly method explicitly lists Yang 1 and Yin 9 placements.
Scope and limitations
The online transcription was consulted, without character-by-character collation against Siku images. Attribute origin narratives to the text and keep the abstract's compilation date separate from the work's composition.

Note reviewed

Open source
rbook.ncl.edu.twWeb pageRare-book catalogue record

遁甲奇門符應經

The National Central Library record of Dunjia Qimen Fuying Jing identifies an old manuscript copy, three juan in two volumes, accession 06583.

Responsibility
Catalogue attribution: Yang Weide (Song), author; Wang Xun, preface
Identifier / locator
06583 · 306.5 06583
Holding institution
National Central Library, Taipei
Year and version
Old manuscript copy; three juan, two thread-bound volumes; copy date not established
Related reading奇门遁甲
Reading and citation notes
Locating the evidence
Consult title, author attribution, preface contributor, edition, juan, quantity, accession, call number and holder. The call number is 306.5 06583.
Scope and limitations
The catalogue attributes authorship to Yang Weide of the Song and a preface to Wang Xun. Folio images were not examined; a date mentioned in a preface does not by itself date these physical volumes.

Note reviewed

Open source
eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jpWeb pageOriginal research paper

奇門遁甲の基礎的研究

Ino Takeshi, Basic Study for One of Chinese Divination; Qi men dun jia, Kenkyū Ronshū 10 (2010), pp. 161–185; discusses rotating and flying boards and illustrates earth plates.

Responsibility
Ino, Takeshi
Identifier / locator
hdl:2115/44606 · 研究論集 10:161–185
Holding institution
Hokkaido University HUSCAP repository
Year and version
2010 · 2010 journal article; full-text PDF supplied by the repository
Related reading奇门遁甲
Reading and citation notes
Locating the evidence
The repository supplies author, date and pagination. In INO.pdf, printed pp. 170–172 locate Jia correspondences, Yang 1, Yin 9 and palace directions; a metadata sheet precedes the article.
Scope and limitations
This review consulted the repository and extracted PDF text, without visual page verification. The study supports method comparison, not predictive efficacy or uniformity across all traditions.

Note reviewed

Open source

RIS export retains filtered results and verified bibliographic fields. Translators and holding institutions remain notes; manuscript dating is not a publication year. Unverified fields stay blank.

05Citation record

Elements of a citation record

When pages, editions or interpretations change, a clear record lets you and later readers retrace the same evidentiary path.

  1. 01Author or responsible institution
  2. 02Title and document type
  3. 03Edition, fascicle or collection number
  4. 04Stable URL and access date
  5. 05Page number for the cited passage
  6. 06Your inference separated from the source