What is the material?
Received edition, excavated manuscript, object, oral account, paper and modern manual support different claims.
LResearch library · source navigator
Primary-text leads, subject literature, historical material and public research resources. Each source retains its related dossier and context for search, comparison and citation.

01Four research routes
One name may belong at once to method, history, text and social practice. These four routes interconnect, but answer different questions.
Check names, aliases, pinyin, family, principles, formation, texts and debates.
Enter 34 dossiers02 · Trace a chronologyUse bones, manuscripts, institutions, print and modern scholarship to distinguish types of evidence.
Open the timeline03 · Clarify a conceptSearch cross-system terms such as image, number, yin-yang, Five Phases, stems-branches, Nine Palaces and Najia.
Search the glossary04 · Conduct researchMove from source layers and textual criticism to algorithm reconstruction and empirical inquiry.
View research methods02Layered reading
The library separates public orientation, specialist study and independent research. You may move quickly, but should not skip checks of terminology, period and source type.
Read atlas summaries, the historical overview and glossary definitions to establish names, periods and families.
For first encounters with Chinese mantic artsEnter a dossier's principles, texts, evidence limits and related systems; record differences among editions and lineages.
For learners with a defined fieldReturn to primary texts, catalogues, archaeology and institutional databases; publish citations, procedures and uncertainties.
For papers, translation, reconstruction and digital projects03Evaluating sources
An institutional page may offer only an introduction; a lineage manuscript may preserve a valuable lead. Evaluation asks exactly what a source can establish, regardless of institutional or lineage status.
Received edition, excavated manuscript, object, oral account, paper and modern manual support different claims.
Separate the date claimed in a text, the surviving edition, attribution and the date of modern cataloguing.
Record chapter, fascicle, page, edition, collection number or a stable link whenever possible.
Layer lineage interpretation, cultural narrative, historical claim and modern validation.
Charts and calculations require inputs, rules, calendar conventions and intermediate steps.
Cases do not generalize automatically; mantic content does not replace medical, legal or financial advice.
04Source catalogue
These links are the sources already annotated in dossiers and the history: museums, universities, research institutes, academic publishers and digital text projects. External content and availability remain under the responsible institution.
A transcription labelled as the Siku edition of Dunjia Yanyi. Its abstract attributes the work to Cheng Daosheng of the Ming; volume one includes several methods and star-gate movement examples.
Note reviewed
The National Central Library record of Dunjia Qimen Fuying Jing identifies an old manuscript copy, three juan in two volumes, accession 06583.
Note reviewed
Ino Takeshi, Basic Study for One of Chinese Divination; Qi men dun jia, Kenkyū Ronshū 10 (2010), pp. 161–185; discusses rotating and flying boards and illustrates earth plates.
Note reviewed
RIS export retains filtered results and verified bibliographic fields. Translators and holding institutions remain notes; manuscript dating is not a publication year. Unverified fields stay blank.
05Citation record
When pages, editions or interpretations change, a clear record lets you and later readers retrace the same evidentiary path.